AGLC4 Rule 12.2.8: Cases: Identifying Judges
Judges are identified in line with rule 10.2.8. When the judgment of the tribunal itself is cited, including a principal judgment, no judges are named and (The Court) is not added. When a separate or dissenting opinion is cited, the judge is named after the pinpoint, with Judge written in full.
AGLC4 page 181
Formatting
- A judge's name goes in round brackets, roman, one space after the pinpoint, with no comma before it.
- The word Judge is spelled out in full before the name; more than one judge takes Judges.
- Nothing is added when the judgment of the tribunal or chamber as a whole is cited: no (The Court) and no list of the judges.
- The final full stop comes after the closing bracket.
Examples
Quoted from the Guide, page 181- 21Prosecutor v Jelisić (Judgement) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber I, Case No IT-95-10-T, 14 December 1999) [105]. [Not: … [105] (The Court). Nor … [105] (Judges Jorda, Riad and Rodrigues).]
- 22Prosecutor v Erdemović (Judgement) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No IT-96-22-A, 7 October 1997) [6] (Judge Stephen).
Not
Quoted from the Guide, page 181- … [105] (The Court).(The Court) is never added when the judgment of the tribunal is cited
- … [105] (Judges Jorda, Riad and Rodrigues).judges are not listed when the citation is to the judgment of the whole chamber
Forms in the rule
Quoted from the Guide, page 181- ‘Judge’
See also
Check your footnotes against these rules
Paste your paper into the free AGLC4 checker and each footnote is graded against the Guide, with the rule it breaks. To write a citation from scratch, use the AGLC4 citation generator.
Formats, examples, passages, tables and the forms marked Not are quoted from the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th ed, Melbourne University Law Review Association, 2018), with the page of the Guide they appear on. Titles, summaries and explanations are our own.